Is There Material Liability of Workers and Employees as a Type of Legal Liability in Contemporary Russian Law and Legislation?
Main Article Content
Abstract
The subject of this article is the social relations regulated by the legal institution of material responsibility of workers and employees. The purpose of the article is the argumentation of the position according to which material liability does not have the status of legal liability. To achieve this goal, the following tasks were implemented: 1) the positions of the overwhelming number of supporters - theorists of law and scientists of labor law - were considered - recognition of material responsibility as one of the types of legal responsibility, along with criminal law, administrative law, etc., which is interpreted as compensation for harm caused to a worker or employee to an enterprise (organization, institution): 2) the views of scientists (Anatoly Borisovich Vengerov, Mikhail Mikhailovich Rassolov, Magomed Imranovich Abdulaev), who do not recognize material responsibility as a type of legal responsibility, have been analyzed; 3) analyzed approaches to understanding legal responsibility; 4) the author's position of understanding legal responsibility and its signs is given, focusing on such as the onset of negative consequences, imposing new additional duties on the offender; 5) the problem of correlation of legal liability measures and protection measures is considered. In conclusion, it is concluded that the identification of measures of legal responsibility and measures of protection have led, first, to an incorrect definition of civil liability, with which material liability is often compared; secondly, the controversial allocation of both the legal function of legal responsibility and material responsibility as a kind of legal responsibility, which, despite its consolidation in labor legislation, in our opinion, in its essential and substantive characteristics refers to protection measures. The scientific article also emphasizes that the problem of distinguishing between legal liability and protection measures is extremely important for law enforcement entities, who must adequately understand what measures of state-legal coercion they apply, which thereby realize their goals. At the same time, they should keep in mind that in practice the named types of state legal coercion are often applied simultaneously (for example, a civil suit in criminal proceedings).
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Penulis.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
References
[2]. Kulapov Victor Lavrenievich, Malko Alexander Vasilievich. Theory of state and law: textbook. M.: Norma, 2009.P. 327.
[3]. Romanov Roman Mikhailovich. Legal responsibility // Theory of state and law: textbook / under total. ed. Orest Vladimirovich Martyshina. M.: Norma, 2007. P. 406.
[4]. Lipinsky Dmitry Anatolyevich. Legal responsibility // Theory of state and law: textbook / otv. ed. Alexander Vasilyevich Malko. M.: KNORUS, 2008.P. 288.
[5]. Shagieva Rosalina Vasilievna, Sevryukov Alexander Pavlovich. Behavior of people in the legal sphere // Actual problems of the theory of state and law: textbook / otv. ed. Rosalina Vasilievna Shagieva. M.: Norma, 2011. Pp. 482-483.
[6]. Nersesyants Vladik Sumbatovich. General theory of law and state: textbook. M.: Norma, 2002.P. 526.
[7]. Timoshenko Ivan Vladimirovich. Legal responsibility // Lyubashits Valentin Yakovlevich, Mordovtsev Andrey Yurievich, Timoshenko Ivan Vladimirovich, Shapsugov Damir Yusufovich. Theory of state and law: textbook. M .: ICC "Mart", 2003. Pp. 590-591.
[8]. Avdeenkova Maria Pavlovna. The system of legal responsibility in modern Russia // State and law. 2007, No. 7, p. 29.
[9]. Chervonyuk Vladimir Ivanovich. Theory of state and law: textbook. M.: INFRA-M, 2006.P. 575.
[10]. Radko Timofey Nikolaevich. Theory of state and law: textbook. Moscow: Academic Project, 2005. P.720.
[11]. Vlasov Vasily Ivanovich, Vlasova Galina Borisovna. Theory of state and law: textbook. Rostov n / a: Phoenix, 2011. P.287.
[12]. Protasov Valery Nikolaevich, Protasova Natalia Valerievna. Lectures on general theory of law and theory of the state. Moscow: Ed. House "Gorodets", 2010. Pp. 415, 418.
[13]. Shaburov Anatoly Stepanovich. Lawful Conduct. Offense. Legal responsibility // Theory of state and law: textbook / otv. ed. Victor Dmitrievich Perevalov. M.: Norma, 2007.Pp. 271, 272.
[14]. Lebedev Vladimir Maksimovich, Fakhrutdinova Tatiana Mikhailovna. Material responsibility of the parties to the employment contract // Labor law: textbook / ed. Vladimir Maksimovich Lebedev. M.: Norma, 2011.P. 243.
[15]. Zhiltsova Yulia Vladimirovna. Material liability of the parties to the contract // Labor law of Russia: textbook / ed. Svetlana Yurievna Golovina, Mstislav Viktorovich Molodtsov. M.: Norma, 2010. P. 455.
[16]. Sweet Julia Pavlovna. Material responsibility of the employee // Labor law. 2004, No. 9. P. 74.
[17]. Poletaev Yuri Nikolaevich. Some legal problems of responsibility in labor law // Labor law. 2001. No. 1. P.32.
[18]. Comment on the Labor Code of the Russian Federation / otv. ed. Yuri Petrovich Orlovsky.- M.: INFRA-M-KONTRAKT, 2008.Pp. 751, 762-763.
[19]. Lazarev Valery Vasilievich, Lipen Sergey Vasilievich. Theory of state and law: textbook. M.: Yurayt, 2010.P. 524.
[20] Vengerov Anatoly Borisovich. Theory of state and law: textbook. M.: Omega-L, 2007. Pp. 544-545, 544-547.
[21]. Rassolov Mikhail Mikhailovich. Problems of the theory of state and law: textbook. M.: UNITY-DANA, Law and Law, 2007.P.329.
[22]. Abdulaev Magomed Imranovich. Theory of state and law: textbook. M.: Economics 2006. P. 499.
[23]. Chervonyuk Vladimir Ivanovich. Offense and legal responsibility // General theory of law and state: textbook / ed. Valery Vasilyevich Lazarev. M.: Norma, 2010. Pp. 352-357.
[24]. Kozhevnikov Vladimir Valentinovich. On the problems of the concept of legal responsibility: general theoretical aspect // Modern law. 2018. No. 12. S.5-9.
[25]. Kozhevnikov Vladimir Valentinovich. On the problem of the theory of legal responsibility // Bulletin of the Tomsk state. University. Right. 2018.No. 28. Pp.5-19.
26]. Social science: textbook / otv. ed. Mikhail Nikolaevich Marchenko. M .: Zertsalo, 1999. P. 330.
[27]. Leist Oleg Ernestovich. Methodological problems of legal responsibility // Problems of the theory of state and law: textbook / ed. Mikhail Nikolaevich Marchenko. - M .: Jurist. Pp. 625, 626.
[28]. Leist Oleg Ernestovich. Sanctions in Soviet law M.: Gosyuridizdat, 1962. Pp.47-48.
[29]. Theory of state and law: textbook. / ed. Pavel Viktorovich Anisimov. M .: IMTs GUK Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2005.S. 162.
[30]. State discipline and responsibility / ed. Lyudmila Ivanovna Antonova, Boris Ivanovich Kozhokhin. L.: Publishing house of Leningrad State University, 1990.Pp. 50, 50-51.
[31]. Khropanyuk Valentin Nikolaevich. Theory of state and law: textbook. M .: IPP "Fatherland", 1993. P.242.
[32]. Kozhevnikov Sergey Nikitich. Legal responsibility // General theory of law: a course of lectures / ed. Vladimir Konstantinovich Babaev. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod High School of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 1993. Pp. 456-457, 467.
[33]. Senyakin Ivan Nikolaevich. Concept, signs and types of legal responsibility // Theory of state and law: a course of lectures / ed. Nikolai Ignatovich Matuzov, Alexander Vasilyevich Malko), Moscow: Yurist. P. 599.
[34]. Theory of state and law: textbook. / ed. Alexei Ivanovich Korolev, Lev Samoilovich Yavich. L .: Leningrad Publishing House. un-that. P.521.
[35]. Protasov Valery Nikolaevich. Theory of state and law: textbook. M.: Yurayt, 2004.P. 158.
[36] Brother Sergei Nikitich. Legal responsibility and legality (Outline of the theory) M.: Jurid. liter, 1976. P. 85.
[37]. Theory of state and law: textbook. / ed. Vladimir Konstantinovich Babaev, Moscow: Yurist, 1999. Pp. 506-507.
[38]. Zrazhevskaya Tatiana Dmitrievna. Responsibility for Soviet state law Voronezh: Voronezh University Publishing House, 1980. Pp.20-21.
[39]. Montesquieu Charles Louis. Elected. manuf. M.: Gospolitizdat, 1955.P. 233.
[40]. Vinichenko Oleg Yurievich, Popov Vladimir Ivanovich. Theory of state and law: textbook. M.: Prospect, 2010.P. 344.
[41]. Kaplunov Andrey Ivanovich. On the main features and concept of state coercion // State and Law. 2004. No. 12. P. 14.
[42]. Kaplunov Andrey Ivanovich. On the classification of measures of state coercion // State and law. 2006. No 3.P.10.
[43]. Alekseev Sergei Sergeevich. General theory of law: textbook. M .: Prospect, 2008.Pp. 202-203.
[44]. Ivanov Alexey Alekseevich. From talion to individualization of legal responsibility. Historical sketch of the formation of the legal principle: monograph. M.: UNITY-DAN, Law and Law, 2009. P.4.
[45]. Theory of law and state: textbook. / ed. Valery Vasilievich. Lazarev. M .: New lawyer, 1997.P. 247.
[46]. Pyanov Nikolai Andreevich. Consulting on the theory of state and law: textbook. Irkutsk: Irkutsk State University, 2010. P. 487.
[47]. Lazarev Valery Vasilievich. Offense and legal responsibility // Problems of the general theory of law and state: textbook / under the general ed. Vladik Sumbatovich Nersesyants. M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 2010. P. 491.
[48]. Rusinov Rudolf Konstantinovich. Legal responsibility // Problems of the theory of state and law: textbook / ed. Sergei Sergeevich Alekseev. M.: Jurid. liter, 1987.P. 316.
[49]. Baranov Vladimir Mikhailovich. Legal responsibility // Theory of state and law: textbook / ed. Vladimir Konstantinovich Babaev. M.: Yurist, 2007. Pp. 544, 546, 550
[50] .Marchenko Mikhail Nikolaevich. Problems of the general theory of state and law in 2 volumes: textbook. M .: Prospect, 2008. Volume 2. Law. P.640
[51]. Leist Oleg Ernestovich. Offense and legal responsibility // Theory of state and law: textbook / ed. Mikhail Nikolaevich Marchenko. M.: Mirror. 2009.Pp. 828, 829.
[52]. Golovistikova Anastasia Nikolaevich, Dmitriev Yuri Albertovich. Problems of the theory of state and law: textbook. M .: Eksmo, 2005.P. 467.
[53]. Kovaleva Elena Leonidovna. Legally significant behavior, offenses, legal responsibility // Problems of the theory of state and law: textbook / ed. Vladimir Mikhailovich Syrykh. M .: Eksmo, 2008.P. 466
[54]. Boshno Svetlana Vladimirovna. Theory of state and law: textbook. M.: Eksmo, 2007. Pp.276-277.
[55]. Dukhno Nikolay Alekseevich, Ivakin Victor Ivanovich. Concept and types of legal responsibility // State and law. 2000. No 6. P. 15.
[56]. Puginsky Boris Ivanovich, Safiullin Dinus Nurimanovich. Legal Economy: Problems of Formation. M.: Jurid. liter, 1991.P. 187.
[57]. Radko Timofey Nikolaevich, Lazarev Valery Vasilievich, Morozova Lyudmila Aleksandrovna. Theory of state and law: textbook. M .: Prospect, 2012.P. 385.
[58]. Kozhevnikov Vladimir Valentinovich. Functions of legal responsibility: general theoretical and sectoral aspects // Modern law. 2015. No 4. P.5-14.
[59]. Baglai Marat Viktorovich, Gabrichidze Boris Nikolaevich. Constitutional law of the Russian Federation: textbook. M .: INFRA-M-KODEKS, 1996. P.425.
[60]. Scientific and practical commentary to the Constitution of the Russian Federation / otv. ed. Valery Vasilievich Lazarev. M.: Spark, 1997. P. 549.
[61]. Nechaeva Alexandra Matveevna. On the legal capacity and capacity of individuals // State and Law. 2001. No 2. P. 32.