Cross Cultural Differences in Cognition: A Study on How Culture Affects the Way We Think
Main Article Content
Abstract
Communication is the exchanging of information through speaking, writing and signals. It plays an important to our development; it is the dissemination of ideas, and information to persons. Cognition is our mental process in which we acquire knowledge and understanding, and this is done through our thoughts, our experiences, and our senses. Cultural differences involve what people’ believe how they behave, the language they speak, and their practices based on their ethnicity. Cross-cultural differences in cognition can be very effective to certain operations conducted by persons; however, it can also limit us based on our perspective. To gather information and to understand how culture affects cognition and the way we think, questionnaires, surveys and experiments were used. Questionnaires were administered to tertiary level students, surveys were administered to teachers and experiments were conducted among students from various culture and background. The experiments were centered on visualization, focus and critical thinking. The purpose of this study is to investigate if cultural differences affect the way we think, and this double-dissociation is discussed in terms of implications for different developmental trajectories, with different developmental sub-tasks in the different cultures.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Penulis.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
References
Cognition definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/cognition
The Mind in the World: Culture and the Brain. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/the-mind-in-the-world-culture-and-the-brain
Chiao, J. Y., & Blizinsky, K.D. (2010). Culture–gene coevolution of individualism: Collectivism and the serotonin transporter gene. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2010;277:529–537
Gentner, D. (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In: Kuozaj S, editor. Language development. Language, thought, and culture. Vol. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 301–334.
Kim, H.S,, Sherman, D. K., Sasaki, J.Y., Xu, J., Chu, T.Q., Ryu, C., et al. (2010). Culture, distress, and oxytocin receptor polymorphism (OXTR) interact to influence emotional support seeking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.107:15717–15721.
Kuwabara, M., & Smith, L. B. (2012). Cross-cultural differences in cognitive development: attention to relations and objects. Journal of experimental child psychology, 113(1), 20-35.
Nisbett, R. E., & Masuda, T. (2003). Culture and point of view. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 100:11163–11170.
Nisbett, R. E., & Miyamoto, Y. (2005). The influence of culture: Holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 9:467–473.