Samosir Regency in the Development of Monument
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to discuss the development of monument in Samosir Regency, North Sumatra, Indonesia by using a descriptive analytic method with a phenomenological approach. The phenomenological approach is a tradition of qualitative research that is rooted in philosophical and psychological, and focuses on the experience of human life (sociology). The results of this study indicate that there are so many public opinions regarding the development of the monument carried out by Toba Batak community in Samosir Regency. However, the development of this monument is inseparable from two aspects, namely in terms of religion / belief and cultural aspects. The development of monument that is so fierce in Samosir Regency carries so many meanings behind the monument itself. The number of parsadaan’s monument in Samosir Regency is 19.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Penulis.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
References
Agger, Ben. 2013. Teori Sosial Kritis, Jakarta: Kreasi Wacana.
Batara Sangti, 1997. Adat dan Budaya Batak. Medan: Monora
Ball, Van. 1976. Sejarah Dan Filsafat Antropologi Jilid I dan II. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Barth, Fredrick, 1986. Kelompok Etnik dan Batasannya, Jakarta: UI-Press.
Campbell, Tom. 1994. Tujuh Teori Sosial, Sketsa, Penilaian, Perbandingan. Yogyakarta. Penerbit Kanisius.
Castles, Lance. 2001. Kehidupan Politik Suatu Kepresidenan di Sumatera: Tapanuli 1915-1940. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Creswell, J W. 1998. Qualitative Inquiry and Reseasch Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. USA: Sage Publication
Danim, Sudarwan. 2002. Menjadi Peneliti Kualitatif. Jakarta: Pustaka Setia.
Dede, Mulyanto, 2014. Pemikiran Antropologi. Jakarta: Marjin Kiri.
Durkheim, E. 1964. The Division of Labour in Society, (terjemahan George Simpson), New York: The Free Press.
Evans – Pritarchad, E. E, 1986. Antropologi Sosial (alih bahasa: Nancy Simanjuntak), Surabaya: BumiAksara
Furchan. Arief, 1992. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Surabaya: Usaha Nasional
Garna, Judistira K. 1992. Teori-Teori Perubahan Sosial, Bandung: PPS – UNPAD
Gerzt, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books
Giddens, A. 1985. Kapitalisme dan Teori Sosial Modern, Jakarta: UI-Press
Gultom, J. 1992, Dalihan Na Tolu Nilai Budaya Suku Batak, Medan: Firma Hasmar.
Hans-dieter, Evers, 1988. Teori Masyarakat Proses Peradaban Dalam Sistem Dunia Modern, Jakarta: Yayasan Obor.
Hartoko. Dick, 1984. Manusia dan Seni. Yogyakarta. Kanisius.
Ihromi, T. O, 1987. Pokok – Pokok Antropologi Budaya, Jakarta: Gramedia.
Kartini, 1983. “Asosiasi Klan Orang Batak Toba di Jakarta”. Dalam Prisma No. 1 Tahun XII. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Kuswarno, Engkus, 2009. Metodologi Penelitian Komunikasi, Fenomenologi Konsepsi, Pedoman dan contoh Penelitian. Bandung: Widya Padjdjaran
Lajar, A.B. 2005. “Jaques Derrida dan Perayaan Kemajemukan”, dalam Mudji Sutrisno & Hendar Putranto (ed). Teori-teori kebudayaan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius
Lauer, R. H, 1993. Perspektif Tentang Perubahan Sosial, (terjemahan), Jakarta: Bina Aksara.
Malau Ismail, 1985. Mengenal Batak, Medan: CV. Kiara.
Malinoski, B. 1983. Dinamika Bagi Perubahan Budaya, Kuala Lumpur: Adabsi SDN. BHD.
Murdock, Peter, George. 1949. Social Structure. London: The Free Press.
Nababan, S.A.E. 1994. Mencari Keseimbangan. Jakarta: Sinar Harapan.
Nainggolan, Togar. 2012. Batak Toba di Jakarta Kontiunitas dan Perubahan Identitas. Medan: Bina Media Perintis.
Ogburn, W. F, 1986. Ketertinggalan Kebudayaan, Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Parlindungan, O. M, 2007. Tuanku Rao. Yogyakarta: LKIS.
Pasaribu B. John. 2002. Pengaruh Injil Dalam Adat Batak, Jakarta. Sinar Harapan.
Pritchard, EE. Evans. 1986. Antropologi Social. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Radcliffe – Brown, AR. 1979. Structure and Fungtion Primitive Society. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Reid, Anthony, 2002. Pulau Orang Meninggal, Mengapa Orang Batak Membangun Monument. Medan: Bina Media Perintis.
Schutz, Alfred. 1973. The Phenomenology of the Social World. London: Heineman Education Book.
Taylor, J. Steven. 1975. Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods. London: John Wiley & Son.
Uli, Kojok. 2009. Surat Batak: Sejarah Perkembangan Tulisan Batak. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Yudosaputro, 1993. Wawasan Seni Budaya. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan Depdikbud.
Vera, Nawiroh. 2014. Semiotika dalam Riset Komunikasi. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Vergouwen. J.C. 2004. Masyarakat dan Hukum Adat Batak Toba. Yogyakarta: LkiS.
Warneck, 1873. Nacht en Morgen op Sumatra Schetsen en Verbalen, Amsterdam: Hoveker & Zoon.
Zaprulkhan, 2015. Filsafat Ilmu Sebuah Analisis Kontemporer. Jakarta, Rajawali Press.
Zenkins, Rechard. 2008. Identitas Sosial. Jakarta: Bina Media.