Cultural Development in Analysis of the Evolutionary Paradigm, Diffusion and Structural Functional
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to examine the process of cultural development analyzed from the perspective of the evolutionary, diffusion, and structural-functional paradigm. The importance of this analysis in the study of various anthropological paradigms is that no matter how simple society, it is absolutely necessary to experience gradual and revolutionary changes in development and culture. These changes lead to the disruption of socio-cultural values in people's lives. The approach used in this study is a qualitative approach with the biographical method. In collecting, processing and analyzing data, the authors searched for various literatures which were followed up with content analysis by comparing, and selecting various contents of literature books to formulate conclusions. The results of the study show that in the life of a very simple and complex society, socio-cultural changes are found. The results of the analysis based on the paradigm of evolution, diffusion and functional structure in the midst of an increasingly complex society found the disruption of socio-cultural values due to the dynamics of society, the rapid development of science and technology.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Penulis.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
References
Gregor, Neonbasu. (2016). Citra Manusia Berbudaya: Sebuah Monografi tentang Timor dalam Perspektif Melanesia. Jakarta : Antara Publishing.
Havilan, A. William. (1998). Antropologi. Jilid 1. Jakarta : Erlangga.
________________.(1993). Antropologi. Jilid 2. Jakarta : Erlangga.
Ihromi, T.O. (1987). Pokok-pokok Antropologi. Jakarta : Yayasan Obor.
Keesing, M. Roger. (1999). Antropologi Budaya Suatu Perspektif Kontemporer. Jilid 1. Jakarta : Erlangga.
________________. (2000). Antropologi Budaya Suatu Perspektif Kontemporer. Jilid 2. Jakarta : Erlangga.
King, T. Victor, dkk. (2012). Antropologi Modern di Asia Tenggara. Jakarta : Kreasi Utama.
Koentjaraningrat. (1958). Metode Antropologi dalam Penjelidikan Masjarakat dan Kebudayaan Indonesia. Jakarta : Universitas.
________________. (1990). Beberapa Pokok Antropologi Sosial. Jakarta : Yayasan Obor.
________________.(1990). Sejarah Teori Antropologi. Jilid 1. Jakarta : UI Press.
________________.(1990). Sejarah Teori Antropologi. Jilid 2. Jakarta : UI Press.
Kupar, Adam. (1996). Pokok dan Tokoh Antropologi Mazhab Inggris Modern. Jakarta : Bharatara.
Levi-Strauss, Claude. (1969). The Elementary Structure af Kinship. Boston : The Bacon Press.
________________. (2009). Antropologi Struktural. Bantul : Kreasi Wacana.
Malinowski, Bronislaw. (1983). Dinamika Bagi Perubahan Kebudayaan. Kualalumpur. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Martozet and Nurwani. Sentimental Values in Tor-Tor Parsiarabu in Tomok Toba Samosir Village. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). P. 167-171.
Pals, L. Daniel. (2012). Seven Theories of Religion. Jogjakarta : IRCiSoD.
Putra, ASH. (2011). Paradigma Epistemologi dan Etnografi dalam Antropologi. Jogjakarta : Gama Press.
Radcliffe-Brown. (1979). Structure and Function in Primitive Society. London : Routledge Kegan Paul.
Ritzer, George. (1985). Sosiologi Ilmu Pengetahuan Berparadigma Ganda. Jakarta Rajawali Press.
Sanderson, K. Steven. (2003). Sosiologi Makro. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.
Sarumpaet, Riris K. Toha, ed. (2016). Krisis Budaya: Oasis Guru Besar Fakultas Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya UI. Jakarta : Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Sayfuddin, FA. Antropologi Kontemporer: Suatu Pengantar Kritis Mengenai Paradigma. Jakarta : Kencana.
Steward, Julius H. 91979). Theory of Culture Change.Urbana: university press
Suyono, Aryono. (1985). Kamus Antropologi. Jakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
Syam, Nur. (2007). Mazhab-mazhab Antropologi. Jogyakarta : Gama Press.
Sztompka, Piotr. (2007). Sosiologi Perubahan Sosial. Jakarta: Kreasi Wacana.
Turner, S. Bryan. dkk. (2010). Kamus Sosiologi. Jakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
Van Ball, J. (1987). Sejarah dan Perubahan Teori Antropologi Budaya. Jilid 1. Jakarta : PT. Gramedia.
________________(19880. Sejarah dan Perubahan Teori Antropologi Budaya. Jilid 2. Jakarta : PT. Gramedia.
Wirawan, IB. (2012). Teori-teori Sosial Dalam Tiga Paradigma. Jakarta: Kencana.
Zulkifli and Ridwan, Muhammad. 2019. Revitalization of the traditional values lost due to the commodification of art/crafts: a case study of Bataknese traditional Ulos. Asian Ethnicity, 541-554