School Management from the Perspective of Social Transformations at Work
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this article we intend to address the context of the school routine that is governed by rules developed by the sectors responsible for school management. In the bureaucratization of school work we see the same meaning and dimensions as the bureaucratization of other sectors of production. As the training of the workforce was transferred to the school, this institution incorporated in its organization and functioning new elements and fundamental characteristics to achieve a good performance as a socializing agency for the worker. On the other hand, the figure of the autonomous teacher, of the humanist, encyclopedist type, has also disappeared. Whether in public education or in the private network, the vast majority of teachers are in the condition of salaried workers. In this way, the process of proletarianization of teaching workers is characterized, characterized by their working conditions. The division of school work, as it developed based on the same principles as the so-called management theories, reinforces the reproduction of capitalist logic in school pedagogical practice because new practices and relationships are crystallized in this practice.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Penulis.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
References
Bernardo, J. Gestores, Estado e Capitalismo de Estado. São Paulo: Ensaio, 1985.
______. Marx crítico de Marx. Porto: Afrontamento, 1977. DOURADO, L.F. et al. Gestão Escolar Democrática. Goiânia: Editora Alternativa, 2003.
Belle, Helena Beatriz de Moura. Escola democrática e escola com burocracia atuação dos colégios da polícia militar no esta-do de Goiás. SABERES, Natal – RN, v. 2, n.esp, jun. 2011. Disponível em:
Brasil. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. De 05 de outubro de 1988.
Brzezinski, Iria. Gestão democrática, participativa, colegiada: concepção da disciplina gestão educacional no programa de pós-graduação em educação da UCG. Goiânia: 2007.
Costa, Jorge Adelino. Imagens organizacionais da escola. Edições ASA: Lisboa, 1996.
Dewey, John. Democracia e educação. Trad. de Godofredo Rangel e Anísio Teixeira. São Paulo: Companhia Editora Nacional,1959.
Freitag, B. Escola, Estado e Sociedade. São Paulo: Moraes, 1986. MORGAN, G. Imagens da Organização. São Paulo: Atlas, 2010.
Martins, Ângela Maria. Gestão e autonomia escolar: um estudo comparado Brasil/Portugal. Rev. Bras. Educ. [online]. 2011, vol.16, n.46 [cited 2020-12-06], pp.69-98. Available from:
Musdiani; Mardhatillah; Khausar. Analysis the Role of Headmaster in Applying Quality of Education in Primary School Districts, Aceh Barat, Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal. Vol 2, n 3, August 2019, Page: 27-35.
Motta, F.C.P. Organização & Poder: empresa, estado e escola. São Paulo: Atlas, 1990.
______. O que é Burocracia. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 2000.
______. Teoria das Organizações. São Paulo: Pioneira, 2003.
______.; Pereira, L.C.B. Introdução à Organização Burocrática. São Paulo: Pioneira, 2004.
Paro, Vitor H. Administração escolar: introdução crítica. São Paulo: Cortez: Autores Associados, 1986.
Popovic, Ružena; Samouilidou, Evdokia; Popović, Jasna; Dolga, Milan. Assessment of the Quality of Life, Health, and Social Wellness in Upper Elementary School Students: Cross-Cultural and Gender Specificity. Britain International of Humanties and Social Sciences (BIoHS) Journal. Vol. 2, n. 1, February 2020, Page: 127-142.
Rafida, Tien. Harahap, Mariani. Implementation of Playing Methods in Learning Science in Improving Children's Critical Thinking Ability in Raudhatul Athfal Assyifa Medan. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) vol 3, n 2, May 2020, Page: 868-875.
Romeu, Sonia A. Escola: objetivos organizacionais e objetivos educacionais. São Paulo: EPU, 1987.
Russo, Miguel H. Teoria e prática da administração escolar: confluências e divergências. 1995. (311 p.) Tese (Doutorado em Educação) - Universidade de São Paulo, 1995.
SÁ, Nicanor Palhares. O aprofundamento das relações capitalistas no interior da escola. In: Cadernos de Pesquisa, n 56, v 20, maio. São Paulo, 1986.
Shaw, C.K.Y. Teoria Hegeliana da burocracia moderna. Fundação João Pinheiro, Belo Horizonte, vol. 7, nº 1, jan/abr 1992.
Tragtenberg, M. “A Escola enquanto Organização Complexa”. In: GARCIA, W. E. Educação Brasileira Contemporânea: organização e funcionamento. São Paulo: McGraw-Hill, 1981, p. 15-30. WEBER, M. Economia e Sociedade. Brasília: UnB, 1994.